One year after the stampede, a mysterious killer named John Carver starts terrorizing the town to avenge the incident. He picks off those who were involved in the tragedy one by one. Together with Sheriff Nelson (played by Patrick Dempsey), Jessica and her friends realize that there is a more sinister holiday plan in motion, and they must identify the killer before they all become his latest victims.
Fear Street Part 3: 1666 narrowly avoids the pitfalls of other threequels
The final chapter of Netflix’s horror event arrives in Fear Street Part 3: 1666. Leigh Janiak returns to the director’s chair for the third film and writes the script with Phil Graziadei and Kate Trefry. Picking up almost immediately after the ending of the previous installment, Fear Street Part 3: 1666 opens with Deena’s nose bleeding. Our heroine sees a vision where she is in 1666 as Sarah Fier. I had mixed feelings about the premise of the third film, which explores the origins of Sarah Fier’s curse. I am not the biggest fan of period-piece horror films. However, having seen the first two installments of Fear Street, I had to know how the trilogy would culminate.
For the first forty minutes or so, Fear Street Part 3: 1666 does drag a bit. However, upon further reflection, I realized what the filmmakers were going for. There are subtle hints throughout the film that ties 1666 together with 1994. The filmmakers accomplish this feat by having some of the actors who made an appearance in the first part of the trilogy return for the threequel playing different characters. Here is the kicker, though; they portray the incarnate and ancestorial versions of their 1994 character. Therefore, be sure to pay close attention to those little details.
Kiana Madeira is still the captain of the ship in the role of Sarah Fier/Deena Johnson. Madeira has impressed me for all three films, with her acting as a strong final girl might be her niche. The actress is the bright spot of the Fear Street Part 3: 1666 as no one else stood out. Benjamin Flores Jr., who was my favorite character in Part 1, serves as a glorified extra for the portion of the film set in 1666. Furthermore, the whole angle of a colony gripped by a hysterical witch-hunt that has deadly consequences for centuries to come goes on for far too long. We have seen it all before, and yes, while I know the plot needed it for the story to come full circle, I think a ½ hour intro would have been just fine and less mundane.
Thankfully, once the curse’s origins receive their reveal and the film returns us to 1994 to wrap everything up, Fear Street Part 3: 1666 regains its footing. The always-delightful Gillian Jacobs gets a chance to shine as her character of Ziggy comes full circle. In contrast, Darrell Britt-Gibson’s character of Martin finally gets a chance to shine and add a bit of substance to the story. It is a shame that Darrell Britt-Gibson did not have more to do in the previous two films, as he has natural comedic timing.
Most film scholars will argue that trilogies suffer the most when there is no need for a third film. Given that, the production team of Fear Street had a cohesive story in mind, and the finale’ of the trilogy works. However, given the expansive titles in the Fear Street catalog and themes, Netflix does not need to make any more movies, in my opinion. Instead, an anthology series that explores the lives of Shadysiders forever is the best route to go.
Narrowly avoiding the threequel curse, Fear Street Part 3: 1666 is a nice close to the trilogy and worth watching.
Final Grade: C+
Fear Street Part 3: 1666 is available to stream now on Netflix.
More to explorer
Rising filmmaker Sky Directs taps into the hood filmmaking guide for his debut feature, Run Nixon. The director also edits the film and pens the screenplay with Michelle Vital. Dre, played by Lil’ Fizz, is a father who faces a race against time to save his son Nixon, played by Emperor Kaioyus.
DISCLAIMER: Before I delve into my review, I’d like to address a point that some historians have raised about the accuracy of certain events portrayed in the movie. For example, some have questioned the depiction of the battle at the Pyramids of Giza and Marie Antoinette’s appearance at her execution. While these critiques are worth noting, it’s essential to remember that historical movies often take creative liberties to make the story more engaging for the audience.
Reviews And Dunn is a unique blog showcasing all things cinema, music & theater.